How To Get On National TV

(No Comments)

Want to be on National TV?
One of my favorite producers at FOX Business is producing a question and answer session on taxes. She’s looking for video selfies of people who have questions about their taxes. If you’re interested in being on National TV, here’s your chance. Needless to say, if they pick your bit you’ll then have a bit of video of yourself to use in your promotions, on your FB page, to impress your parents, whatever.
Just shoot a :10 to :15 second video of yourself asking a tax question you’re interested in such as: “Can I write off my cat’s vet bills?” “Is my farm deduction transferable?” “Are my veteran’s benefits going to increase this year?”
Remember that the network wants something interesting to look at so if you ask about your cat, have it in your arms. If you ask about your farm benefits, film yourself sitting on a tractor or maybe dress up like Grant Wood’s American Gothic. If you’re asking about veteran’s benefits, wear your uniform.
Remember too that quality counts so check your lighting, the audio, and anything else that will make your snippet look and sound as good as possible.
Send your MP4 file to Joanna Chow at, by EOD Monday 3/10/2014.

Posted on March 6th, 2014

Adding MOP To Your Marketing.


Spend enough time talking to online marketers or digitally savvy traditional advertisers and you’ll hear lots of conversation—and consternation—about the power of online reviews. According to these marketers, the comments and critiques on review sites such as TripAdvisor and Yelp are key to either their company’s success or failure.

HBR-Cover-finalBut according to a fascinating new article in this month’s Harvard Business Review, titled “What Marketers Misunderstand About Online Reviews,” the most important factor in determining the significance online reviews play in a consumer’s propensity to purchase is not necessarily the quality of the reviews but the type of product the client is looking for and the way the consumers determine what to buy.

According to the authors, consumer purchase decisions are affected by three different factors: “…Prior preferences, beliefs, and experiences” (P), “information from marketers” (advertising, packaging, and other marketing tools) identified as M, and “input from other people and information services” (O). The authors say these factors create a zero-sum game where “…when the impact of O on a purchase decision about a food processor goes up,” for example, “the influence of M or P, or both, goes down.”
What’s even more interesting is that the authors have found that the importance of the various factors – P, M, or O – on purchases is less determined by the customers’ demographics and more by the type of product they’re buying. Low-involvement purchases that are mostly a matter of habit, a gallon of milk, say, or laundry detergent generally are not influenced by others’ opinions. P, or previous experience, is the most important factor in these decision-making processes.

At the far other end of the spectrum, luxury goods such as designer handbags, expensive watches and upscale automobiles, are also O-independent. That’s because these products appeal to buyers’ emotions instead of their utility.

Chain restaurants are also mostly O-independent because consumers know exactly what to expect from a Subway or McDonald’s and have no need to learn what anyone else thinks. But the uncertainty of independent restaurants makes them O-dependent and explains the success of review sites such as Yelp. Non-luxury cars, too, are O-dependent, with customers conducting extensive research and putting significant faith in the cars’ brand. (Brand value itself can be O-dependent but it can also be increased substantially by savvy M.)

Finally, digital products such as consumer electronics are very O-dependent with buyers looking to early adopters and more educated users for input and recommendations. But interestingly enough, during sale periods such as Black Friday, the marketers’ influence (M) – such as packaging and in-store promos – becomes more and more important as buyers do not have the time to do the research they’d otherwise conduct.

The authors close the article by pointing out that emerging technology continues to change both sources of O and the way consumers can access that information. They conclude by writing that “as the influence mix evolves, success will come to companies that can closely track the sources of information their customers turn to and find the combination of marketing channels and tools best suited to the way those consumers decide.” Very good advice.

PMO explanation

But what the authors don’t point out is that there are things marketers can do immediately to reduce the influence of O and increase their sales. First, a strategically planned move to the luxury end of the consumer spectrum—where emotion overrides intellect—will allow marketers to sell more and more product regardless of available information. Next, marketers can strive to build an emotional connection between their consumer and their brand. In this scenario, the functionality of the product (an attribute ironically never mentioned by the authors) becomes less and less pronounced while what the product does for the user becomes of primary importance.

In other words, building brand value (coincidentally the title of my last book) is one technique retailers and marketers can use to both sell more product and reduce the effect of other’s posted opinions on those sales. Like the door slamming or tire-kicking that yesterday’s car buyer might have done to determine quality, brand value becomes the shorthand that encourages today’s consumers to purchase.

Posted on March 2nd, 2014

The World’s Most Perfect Destination


I travel so often that it wasn’t until my daughter was 13 or 14 that she figured out that shampoo comes in large bottles too.

Because so much of that travel relates to building compelling tourism brands for destinations around the world, I often sit in the plane on the way home and think about how to construct the ultimate travel destination.

We’d start with a tropical island in the middle of the ocean but not too far from the coast of the United States. We’d enjoy wonderful views and the sound of the surf crashing against our beautiful beaches. Plus, our weather would be at its best just when our feeder markets were experiencing their coldest, dreariest conditions.


Inside our island we’d plant lush rainforests with soaring mountains and burbling waterfalls. We’d stock it with vegetables and trees, fruits and flowers, and all sorts of game and exotic creatures.

Because we’d want our destination to attract tourists from all over the world, we’d fill it with beautiful hotels—both large and small. We’d build in all sorts of activities so our visitors will never run out of things to do. And because nearly 80% of travelers say that shopping is one of their favorite activities, we’d establish a vibrant retail sector with shops and malls rivaling those in New York, Hong Kong, and London.

We’ll fill our island with culture—both indigenous and imported. We’ll have museums, symphonies, ballets, art festivals, folkloric dance, and theater. We’ll also have sports – spectator and participatory – so we’ll need to build golf courses, tennis courts, arenas, ball fields, hiking and running trails, BMX courses, swimming pools, and whatever other facilities our tourists are looking for.

While we’re at it, why not make our island as exotic as possible? Let’s speak a language other than English. Let’s offer our visitors food and art and an entire experience that’s nothing like they’d find at home. But in order to ensure their comfort and convenience, let’s make sure that our residents also speak fluent English and that our US visitors can spend their dollars, use their health plans, and depend on the full faith and credit of the United States. And since less than 20% of mainland Americans have passports, let’s make sure passports aren’t even necessary. Otherwise at $165 per application, a family of four would need to spend more than $660 before they even leave home.

What else? Some travelers like big cities while others prefer small towns, so let’s build both. And let’s connect the municipalities with a superhighway system that makes it easy to get around. Let’s also build state-of-the-art airports and seaports to make it as convenient as possible for our customers to visit.

Because so many travelers say they’re looking for an authentic experience, we’ll build historic regions complete with architecture combining the best of both local and European traditions. We’ll have an old town with cobblestone streets, restored churches and forts, and other charming amenities so our tourists linger and learn.


And since we’ve built an island in the ocean, why don’t we surround our island with other smaller islands where visitors can find an even more natural and personal experience if that’s what they want?


Finally, let’s have our residents travel freely and frequently to the continental U.S. and evangelize our brand. Our residents should include sports stars, politicians, musicians, actors, chefs, and just plain folk to spread the word about what a rich, vibrant, worldly culture we offer.

All that’s left is to name our island. If you live in the US on the west coast, my guess is you’ll name it Hawaii. If you live on the east, maybe you’ll call it Puerto Rico. So why is it that Hawaii is one of the leading tourist destinations in the country while Puerto Rico is struggling to maintain its tourism industry? Especially odd when you consider that Puerto Rico is only two to three hours away from 36% of the U.S. population while Hawaii is more that six hours away from only 18%. Do the quick arithmetic and you’ll realize that Hawaii is twice as far away from half as many people as Puerto Rico.

Like the most popular tourism brands in the country – New York, Las Vegas, Orlando, and MiamiHawaii’s brand essence is instantly recognizable and understandable. And therein lies its success. As soon as Puerto Rico figures out how to present a compelling, comprehensive, and consistent brand message to the rest of the United States, their fortunes will soar as well. If you’ve seen the economic news about Puerto Rico lately, you can only hope that it happens quickly.

Posted on February 23rd, 2014

“Beware Irony…


…those who get it, get it anyway. Those who don’t, never will.”

Have you seen the ad for the new Cadillac ELR? It features a very smug 40-something actor, Neal McDonough, strolling through his Dwell magazine-perfect house, kissing his beautiful wife, high-fiving his beautiful kids, and showing off all his tastefully extravagant belongings while pontificating on the materialistic benefits of our consumer society.

“Why do we work so hard? For what? For this? For stuff?

“Other countries they work, they stroll home, they stop by the café. They take August off. Off. Why aren’t you like that? Why aren’t we like that? Because we’re crazy driven hard-working believers, that’s why.

“Those other countries think we’re nuts. Whatever. Were the Wright brothers insane? Bill Gates, Les Paul, Ali? Were we nuts when we pointed to the moon? That’s right, we went up there you know what we got? Bored. So we left. Got a car up there, left the keys in it. You know why? Because we’re the only ones going back up there; that’s why.

“But I digress.

“It’s pretty simple you work hard, you create your own luck and you gotta believe anything is possible. As for all the stuff, that’s the upside of only taking two weeks off in August. N’est-ce pas?”

If you spend as much thinking about these things as I do, you might notice that besides being beautifully shot and perfectly art-directed, this ad presents a never-before-seen amalgam of righty American exceptionalism and lefty aesthetics and eco-sensitive electric automobiles. Kind of like the ‘Madison Avenue’ version of the person who says they’re “socially liberal and economically conservative,” it’s a mash-up of two previously mutually exclusive mindsets.


Which brings up an interesting question — exactly what is Cadillac trying to say with this spot? Is the ad tongue-in-cheek and poking ironic fun at our quest for stuff? Or is Cadillac seriously going after the specific demographic that will identify with the ad’s protagonist and his beliefs?

I posted it on Facebook and got some fascinating and different points of view.

Brian Walters wrote: “I reacted to it the way I think they wanted. It was fun, cocky and impishly arrogant. The actor smirked just enough for us to know he wasn’t being too literal. And I do think it is smart to have the electric car be the hero at the end. It was a surprise ending. I say kudos.”

Steve Sauls said: “My first reaction was that the ad is xenophobic and negative and that the ad was designed to appeal to a narrow, calculated market to bring them back to Cadillac from BMW, Mercedes and Lexus.”

Most of my friends thought it was pretty funny. My wife and daughter hated it.


What I think is that we’re seeing the next logical evolution of the Prius phenomenon. You might remember that when it was first released, Toyota’s little doorstop-shaped hybrid wedge became the instant darling of the Hollywood elite – including Gwneyth Paltrow, Kate Hudson, Orlando Bloom, Natalie Portman, Cameron Diaz, and even Harrison Ford. Why? Because unlike the equally efficient but visually indistinguishable Honda Civic Hybrid, the unique shape of the Prius announced to the world that its driver cared about the environment while all the prosaic Honda said was, “I’m driving a cheap car.”


I don’t think Cadillac is being ironic at all. Instead, I think that what you see is what you get. What Cadillac is saying is that regardless of the rest of the world going to hell in a handbasket, you can have your cake and eat it too. Buy their new ELR and you can own all the neat toys you want, think you’re successful and superior, AND tell the world that you care. Even if you really don’t.

All in all, a pretty good deal for an MSRP of only $82,135.

(Yes, I am being ironic now. Oh, never mind…)

Posted on February 17th, 2014

Early To Bed. Early To Rise.


The flight to San Juan was scheduled to leave at 7:25 AM, so my mental math looked something like this:

“Want to get to airport an hour early, that’s 6:25 AM.

Thirty minutes to get to airport, that’s 6:00.

Half an hour to get ready, gotta get up at 5:30.”

But here’s what happened:

Was still jet-lagged from my trip back from Southeast Asia and California the day before, so I went to bed early and was wide awake at 4:30 AM. Finally got out of bed at 5:00. Took 40 minutes to leave house and 20 minutes to get to airport because of early hour, so I arrived at 6:00. Zipped through TSA pre-check, grabbed a snack and still got to gate at 6:15 – at least 45 minutes before boarding time.

Know what happened next? Absolutely nothing. I read the paper, sipped my coffee, and boarded the flight when they called my section. No stress, no drama, no nothing.

Flight on the way back landed late and I was pulled over by a policeman for speeding.

“Where’s the fire, Mario?” he asked.

“Sorry officer,” I answered. “I’m late for a meeting.”

“You should have left sooner.”

Damn it! Why didn’t I think of that? I had no good response, so I just nodded and opened my hand and took the ticket.

Leave early, stress free. Leave late, stressful.

Can it really be as easy as that?

“Leave early?!” I hear you screaming. “Who’s got time to leave early? And anyways, what the hell do I do when I get to the airport or meeting with an extra half hour to kill?”

Here’s a radical idea – you’ve probably got your smartphone, laptop or iPad with you already – why don’t you do what you’d do if you were still sitting at your desk? Answer messages and emails, reread your proposal or presentation, read the newspaper, write blog posts, or just sit quietly and think.

The simple point is that thanks to today’s technology, where you are has less and less to do with what you can accomplish than ever before. And so the old rules just don’t apply anymore. The trick is to figure out how to apply the new realities and possibilities to make your life as enjoyable, productive, and stress-free as possible.

All of a sudden, location and productivity are not joined at the hip. A workspace can be anywhere with power and Wi-Fi. The inspiration muse can be serviced wherever you are. An hour in a Starbucks between meetings can be more productive than running back to the office only to turn around and run back out again. And when you are in the office and face-to-face, that time can be better spent doing the personal warm and fuzzies — the “atta-boys” and “atta-girls” that are best done in person.

Running late and making yourself and everyone around you crazy no longer needs to be a part of your life – or your brand. All you have to do is change the way you approach your calendar and your to-do list.

Try it. I think you’ll like it.

Posted on February 10th, 2014

Branding The Super Bowl Dog and Pony Show.

(No Comments)

Unless you’re a Seattle Seahawks fan, Super Bowl XLVIII wasn’t much of a game. I’ll bet most Super Bowl parties broke up before the fourth quarter was over. Yours probably did too.

Unless you’re a hardcore advertising fan, the Super Bowl ad show wasn’t very entertaining, either. Other than a few stalwarts and outliers, the ads were a big bore.

Budweiser is still using horses and dogs, albeit an adorable puppy this year. Coca-Cola is still trying to teach the world to sing almost 45 years after their first attempt. And Chevy is still telling stories about men and their trucks.


What was new this year was a circumspect attitude that prized warm and fuzzy over risqué. Also new was a strategy that mixed celebrities willy-nilly in order to appeal to all of the different demographics that watch the Super Bowl.

GoDaddy, the advertiser we could always count on for sleaze, changed its tune with two slaphappy ads that could have been shot for almost anyone. Axe, too, left its bodacious babes at home, with an ad that focused on world peace.

Bud Light shoehorned its ads full of Minka Kelly, Don Cheadle, Lilly the llama, and Arnold Schwarzenegger. And Radio Shack filled their ad with a laundry list of celebrities from the 1980s, including Hulk Hogan, Teen Wolf, Chuckie, Mary Lou Retton (!!), and Dee Snyder from Twisted Sister. Snyder, by the way, probably earned more money by appearing in this ad than he did from his entire musical career.


And talking about guys who are earning money from appearing in ads instead of doing what made them famous, Tim Tebow proved that not only won’t he be playing football, but that an acting career isn’t in his future either. Lucky thing he has a good sense of humor.

Beefcake was back with both a naked David Beckham and Chevy’s stud bull that was a good enough actor to lick his lips just when the voiceover said, “Hello Ladies.” And both Volkswagen and VaporZone made pee jokes with actors standing at a urinal.


Chrysler built on 2011’s “Imported From Detroit” and 2012’s “Halftime in America,” upping the antes from former spokesmen Clint Eastwood, Eminem, and Berry Gordy with — who would have thunk it — Bob Dylan.


At $4 million a pop, advertisers really owed it to their viewers and their bottom lines to put their best work on display. Unfortunately, their ads were upstaged by the Seahawks skills and halftime entertainer Bruno Mars’ talent. That being said, Budweiser’s dog and pony show generated over 34 million YouTube views before the game even started, a number that has since swelled to nearly 40 million. That might be the most important measure of all.

Want to see what I had to say about the spots on FOX Business? Click HERE.


Posted on February 4th, 2014

Following Your Own Sense Of Justice.

(No Comments)


We’d love it if you would  join us at the opening of Following Your Own Sense of Justice, Miami-Dade College’s
curated show of Leonard Turkel’s 3D pictograms.
For more information, or to RSVP, please call Toma Rusk at 831/402-5574 or email

A different view of social justice.






Posted on January 31st, 2014

The Importance of Brands.


It wasn’t until I spent three weeks in Southeast Asia with my family that I really learned the true importance of brands.

It shouldn’t have been that way because for the last 30 years I’ve been running a brand management firm that helps our clients create and build their brands through advertising, design, strategic planning, and online activities. I’ve written books on building brands and spent a lot of time zipping around the world teaching audiences what I’ve learned about building brands. I’m even lucky enough to appear on Money with Melissa Francis on FOX Business each week talking about what’s happened in the world of advertising and branding. But what I learned is that you CAN teach an old dog new tricks.

Our flight to Singapore included a layover in the spanking new transit terminal in Doha, Qatar. Other than housing facilities for the planes that are taking off and landing, Doha’s airport is really just a shopping mall. And all the products they sell there are big brands. Hugo Boss, Tom Ford, Tumi, Ferragamo, Samsung, Canon, Porsche, and Lamborghini are everywhere. So are TAG Heuer, IWC, Escada, Nikon, Chanel, and Montblanc. Plus every liquor and cigarette brand you can name – all in a Muslim country, no less.

Singapore, too, was awash in eastern and western brands. As was Bangkok, Saigon, Da Nang, and Hanoi. But none of those places compared to Hong Kong where I saw more brand names and logos than I’ve ever seen in my life.

It wasn’t just the upscale malls and airport stores that featured these brands. They were prevalent in every market we visited—from the floating market in in Bangkok and the street stalls in Saigon to the night market in Hong Kong.

It was most obvious in the counterfeit watch stalls and arrays spread out on blankets on busy avenues. Rolexes, Patek Philippes, Panerai, Omegas, and IWCs seemed to be the most popular. Of course they weren’t the real items, but then again, they weren’t five, 10, or 20 thousand dollars either. I didn’t bargain for one but I did watch a few tourists haggle for their counterfeit wristwatches for much less than $100 apiece.

What I found most interesting was that the tourists I watched weren’t actually buying timepieces. Because if they wanted to know the time they could always look at their mobile phones, dashboard clocks, laptops, iPads, or the myriad of watches they probably already own.

What they were buying were brands. They wanted to come back from the Orient with a status symbol on their wrists to tell the world just how successful they are. Accuracy, or even approximate time, is irrelevant—it’s all about the brand.

That being said, there’s not any reason to believe that the counterfeit watches from the Asian stalls are any less competent at time telling than the real things they copy to begin with.

In this world of modern computerized manufacturing, actual function is becoming less and less important to consumers. Thanks to today’s technology, most things simply work regardless of their brand name or cost. In fact, it’s very likely that regardless of the brand name on their boxes, many differently branded products are manufactured in the same factories. Moreover, most affluent consumers already have everything they could possible want or need. Instead, their purchases are about upgrading, freshening or replacing — I’m sure that no one I saw buying watches at those stalls actually needed another timepiece.

Brand value, the true reason today’s consumers purchase, is not about product function but about creating stories that help consumers tell the world who they are. From expensive foreign cars in the driveway to faux-expensive watches on wrists, it’s the brand value that both differentiates products from one another and incites customers to buy and buy more.

If you don’t believe me, book a trip to Southeast Asia. And if you need someone to carry your bags, give me a call. On your branded Android or iPhone, of course.

Posted on January 29th, 2014